I expect all training centers who take in K-9 age students to make necessary arrangements to appear to be non profit - whatever that means in practice.

Subsequently, as someone wrote above, it removes the apples that are in it only for huge profits. In my view the profitability matters more in this evaluation than what are core subjects and what not.

Those failing such measurements would probably have their business licenses gradually revoked and/or not renewed.

If I read correctly, this does not yet have any impact on preschool/kindergarten teaching. But if the goal is truly to reduce study burden of kids, and save time and money of their parents, it won't be long until it extends to younger kids.

In that perspective, I see this as another approach to motivate families to make the second or third child.

These new guidelines, released a week ago, will probably affect future job opportunities for many foreign teachers in China:

www.china-briefing.com/[...]

Have you confirmed the Chinese spelling for the village name?

In mountainous parts of Yunnan, walnut is a main cash crop and the label on the map may reflect that resource, rather than the actual village name.

"exempt the costs of raising a child under the age of three from personal income tax"

This of course would only benefit those who earn enough to have taxable income (after 5000 RMB automatic deduction) to begin with. At risk of political incorrectness, I'd say this will be the final stage of poverty reduction - weeding out the poor.

Chinese jurisdictions have the option to connect this to social credit, which is just (perhaps) a milder layer of criminalization.