@alien
This is where I must respectfully disagree - on the alleged academics of climate change. Universities are a business (assumption).
Faculty compete for grants and subsidies - funded by governments (political) and industry (commercial).
Assuming academia is a business AND they compete for grants, publications, and subsidies (in addition to consulting activities), then logically, academia is heavily influenced by both politics and by commercial exploitation - an extrapolative and qualitative deduction (or induction, depending on one's perspective).
Examples from commercial industry show the broad scale and state of industrial corruption and occasionally epic displays of social and governmental/political irresponsibility - nothing new there - across a broad spectrum of markets and market segments - so I believe that academia is highly biased and influenced by both politics and commercial interests and benefactors, in addition to philanthropists - which are more rare and more focused.
Politicians jump on social responsibility bandwagons for a variety of reasons - but mostly to attract free publicity as a good and socially responsible leader - fodder for their next election - however we also know that generally, politicians are rather multi-faced and split-tongued, spouting political rhetoric to fit the occasion, regardless of consistency, actual due diligence research, and the associated honor, integrity, morality issues.
As I believe, based on the above observational assumptions - that academia is tainted - then generally I believe that most science is potentially tainted (high energy particle physics aside).
So, while we may disagree on the integrity of the alleged academics on BOTH sides of the climate change issue - I believe we can both agree that the derived benefits of the issue are invaluable - a great concern and respect for our environmental management.
And - for the record - I'm surprised nobody dragged in the Three Gorges Dam for contributing to climate change - that was a sensational global issue decades ago.
Concrete manufacturing is also an alleged significant polluter, steel industry, coal industry - all of these are core development and employment industries in China and pillars of China's development - so I have absolutely no doubt the US will jump on any bandwagon in an attempt to "contain China". Obama's "pivot to asia" is blatant anti-China hegemony and his eight years in office is a continuation of that oppressive political agenda.
China's scale makes EVERYTHING it does a major impact in global economies, global environment, and global societies.
Instead of academically debating climate change - I would propose we focus on how we can economically limit the effects of man-made pollution through add-on industries - migration from fossil fuel-based vehicles to electrics (powered by renewable energies), responsible water management, responsible agricultural management (soil, water, and food chain pollution and poisoning), ocean management, air pollution management (cars, trucks and buses are the major sources of this pollution - so the migration to electrics will eventually mitigate this issue) and so on ad infinitum.
Finding solutions which profit oriented businesses can accept (usually with government prodding) without driving them into bankruptcy (thank you US EPA) is the holy grail of industry.
Yunnan is a major mining industry - how to add environmental management to those industries while acceptably impacting their profits is a great place to start (and would that require a new thread?).
Kunming's waste-water management is epically poor - mixing rain water run-off with raw sewage - and then piping that to the waste-water treatment plants - the burst in traffic results in raw or poorly processed sewage pouring into DianChi.
Cleaning up Kunming's canals in a sustainable manner as opposed to the occasional band-aids.
Migrating city buses to electrics (that will make BYD VERY happy).
Yunnan has extensive construction (real estate development, road and highway construction, etc) - so doing LEED-like ratings on these projects (great for government work) during construction and the follow-on operations would be a great academic study for government - especially since most Yunnan academia is poorly supported by industry (aka negligible grants, negligible subsidies, negligible consulting opportunities for faculty) - so outright bribery, coercion, and extortion issues aside - that would be a great pilot project for the environmentally interested.
Is anyone interested in a new and separate thread or forum on how the gokm community can participate in constructive debate of this apparently hot topic, leading to economically feasible and sustainable opportunities?
Perhaps we can eventually create our own consulting group and supplement our meager incomes while performing an arguably socially and environmentally invaluable service?
Many of the more senior (seniors and retirees) members of gokm have tremendous depth of professional experience, untapped by this community and society in which we're immersed.
We may all disagree on certain issues, but I believe all are interested in the various social and environmental issues that abound around us - especially if that generated consulting income (assuming we can find buyers).
Protests challenge Myanmar's Belt and Road participation
发布者Nice signs - so obviously sponsored and incited by cursed foreign NGOs with no responsibilities to the actual people of Myanmar. Hydropower provides a source of sustainable renewable energy. Energy is one of the core pillars of all sustainable economies.
No economy - no development - poverty, healthcare, education.
EGO Brewery latest entrant into Kunming's craft beer scene
发布者Interesting. Inspired to go visit...
Public Notice: A message from the Kunming Public Security Bureau
发布者Fantastic notification! Thank you Gokm and PSB! Hopefully, we'll never have to deal with this - but it's good to have the phone numbers just in case!
Yunnan gets ok to grow weed to feed rising cannabis need
发布者Seriously? And I suppose the soldiers can smoke pieces of their uniforms in times of need? Amazing...
Interview: Co-founding a Kunming institution with Colin Flahive
发布者Seriously great article on a group of seriously great human beings - treating people with dignity and respect. Company HR and executives could learn a lot from doing case-studies on the Salvador's journey on how to treat people with dignity and respect - while also being moderately profitable.
Now you all know how companies can afford to pay executives and board members those ludicrous salaries and bonuses. They treat staff as disposable commodities as opposed to human beings and or family, creating an environment of zero if not negative corporate and or brand loyalty.