@englishbusiness
There are three elements of chinese military strategy, taught to every school child for generations, embedded in this response. Not all understand, but all know these strategies.
Just speaking a language fluently is insufficient to create, grow/sustain, and scale long-term relationships.
You'll need to understand your stakeholders, so you can lead them, influence, them, attract them, as opposed to following trends, which has its advantages and risks. Leaders enjoy the benefit of first kill, while the pack that follows compete amongst themselves for the scraps. This is one of tenets of entrance barriers. While your competitors are fighting over the carcass of last year's kill, you've moved on to the next market or market segment, within your chosen domain(s).
LANDSCAPE AKA BATTLEFIELD
China is not the China most westerners see. It is as diverse and as complicated as Europe in both locations and peoples - aside from the debatable and arguable advantage of centralized control.
HARD OR TECHNICAL SKILLS
2. If you have a business MODEL, it should be long term, difficult to copy, profitable (short term to longterm), sustainable, and scalable. These principles hold true regardless of where you set up shop - but even more so here - as a population density 4-5x that of the USA would logically dictate a competitive environment 4-5x as fierce.
Most successful 1 trick ponies - fail within 3 years. Typically, the first year is sunk cost building up your brand and business. The second year is spent trying to fend off copycats, and the third year is spent shutting down from ludicrously excessive competition, offering poorer cut-rate knockoff services, starving and strangling your baby to death.
That is the reality of competition and we haven't even delved into the force majeur realms of dirty tricks, corruption, and political risks.
Sales take place all over china - but can you survive on their profit margins or in their highly competitive environments until you can establish brand and distinctive differentiation?
Do you have multiple exit strategies, to include catastrophic failure?
SOFT SKILLS
This mostly addresses your short term plan to establish a beachhead, to the longer term organic and ultimately exponential growth. You'll need to have a strong executable technical plan, well trained and loyal staff and loyal stakeholders - but it will ultimately depend on your ability to influence and lead others as a leader and visionary, if you're ever to make it off the beach and push inland.
China is littered with the carcasses of local businesses inspired by brilliant ideas and native level Chinese language abilities.
University in Yunnan requires students to run 240 kilometers for graduation
发布者As a parent - I'd send my kids there just because of that policy. I wonder if it'll spread to state owned companies.
Update: Kunming Metro Line 3 open as of August 29
发布者Wow - thanks for the update(s). This opens a brand new line of journalistic travel reporting fog gokm. What to see & do around each station (temples, eateries, entertainment, etc).
Look forwards to the municipal subway exit travel reporting (for tourists and locals alike).
And you can also do travel video spots for the local tv channels - chinese love (I think) to see foreigners who can speak reasonably fluently and whom are delighted with the local culture(s).
I'm just glad we can finally (maybe) get to dianchi without grabbing taxis, didiche or buses.
Report: Communally owned forests hold key to healthier China re-greening
发布者Central government mandates general or qualitative requirements, It is then the responsibility of various provinces to implement quantitative results.
How would one structure sustainable pilot projects, to demonstrate such diversity - to include funding and finance? Each ecosystem is diverse from the next - so to initiate a project requires finance to study the current (or previously existing) bio-diversity, to develop a sustainable plan to move forwards with responsibly and sustainably managed resources.
This requires access to academic and commercial resources - who won't work for free.
Alien's solution is direct, but probably not scalable, sustainable and therefore feasible (too many people - reduce population).
When presenting an issue or problem, it's always a good idea to have at least three potentially feasible solutions for discussion and implementation.
Interview: Brian Eyler on Baihetan, China's second largest dam
发布者please forgive the grammatical errors... (example conscious vs conscience)...etc.."dammed" spelling corrector...
Interview: Brian Eyler on Baihetan, China's second largest dam
发布者@east
Concur with your assessment - but fossil fuels are a known depleting asset, hence the long-term (perhaps beyond our lifespan) national impetus behind these assets.
Also agree that hydropower construction can be infinitely more LEED-ish in their construction behavior.
On that note - many of the more heavily polluting industries such as mining, refineries, etc can be made significantly cleaner through energy based solutions - which we have yet to witness generally in China.
For example, pollution from Guangzhou's fossil plants can energy-assisted technologies currently in use in developed countries - so that's perhaps a hybrid solution that benefits both parties - assuming one can find the funding to implement such technologies AND the project owners are sufficiently motivated to implement such cleaner technology supplements/complements - aka central government mandates, grants, and subsidies.
As for the legendary Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) - those usually come with FIT (Feed in Tariff) agreements - hence the short-term nature of these agreements. We've seen globally that FIT programs are short-term solutions to encourage market entry, but are non-sustainable.
As for grid congestion - that's an issue of planning. As you've noted, China and even developed countries still have not developed the technologies to enable efficient long-distance transmission of power.
Hydropower isn't going away - so the best solution is to hybridize and try to work with what we have to minimize all the valid issues you've raised and do our best to render these systems more ecologically harmonious - example hybridized sluice - where we can still sustainably maintain the downstream environments at a safe but sustainable level.
Too often, commercial and environmental interests stand diametrically opposed and commercial interests typically dominate.
So if you have viable suggestions that can be presented to the NDRC, I'd be more than willing and interested to discuss and perhaps help frame the projects and finance (in English, regrettably), along with potential downstream domestic government and pseudo-government investors, to add to hopefully create a potentially overwhelming sustainable, scalable, and feasible solution that NDRC can in good conscious mandate.
It's not a perfect solution - but perhaps a good first step to more responsible resource utilization and management and infinitely better than standing still, diametrically opposed.
I suppose this would be called "managed wetlands" or something like that (as opposed to eliminated wetlands) - assuming the issue is downstream wetland ecosystems.
Feel free to PM (private mail) me to discuss how to move forwards - perhaps even generate multi-lateral support.
While it may not seem apparent, ALL governmental infrastructure projects require feasibility studies, which include social and environmental impact studies - so the first starting place is to examine those studies, to understand the current standard government logic and behavior in approving and or waiving of those social and environmental costs.
To access this information, you'll absolutely need a strong commercial or government partner - the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model.
Again - the objective is to change the working model so we're all actively working together as opposed to butting heads (with a little central government mandate to help encourage the reticent).