BLobbles,
1st, Sorry to sound harsh, but I think on this topic you do deserve it a bit, no offense.
You have no idea what my attitude or views about the situation of laowai in China are, except that I don't think there is a pending catastrophe. For all you know, I am even more sensitive to the xenophobia that we face than you are. The bigger the problem, the more wrong what you wrote was.
What you do or should know, is that I believe that copying the logic of xenophobia is not the answer and is hypocritical and counterproductive.
I am not sure how, after my last post, you can still fail to see that.
I think it is because you might think that laowai are a concerted force, or some kind of social class, therefore you believe that other laowai represent you, so you agree with the xenophobes about how things work. You just part ways with them to the extent that you want them to know that not everybody in your organization likes our current policy. But there is no organization and there is no policy. Did the rapist scream "In the name of all laowai, I will now attack" before he commenced his assault?
I am not only saying that "I" or "you" personally have not done bad things to "Asians". I am saying that historical crimes are really not the real reasons for xenophobia, as they are absolutely cherry picked and manipulated. And, that those crimes are done by certain groups, armies, and administrations who share material interests/goals, not by all people who simply share non-chineseness. In fact those foriegn groups often also did some crimes upon many of us outside of china as well. So, on this point, there is no "we".
The headlines: really? The US soldier one is totally not xenophobic by itself. I didn't read the article. Unless it talks about how, because this will effect all foreigners in Korea, and rightly so, the soldier should get life in jail, then it doesn't compare to what you wrote.
The new york cops are cops form new york-it is a statement of fact, and they represent a concerted professional organization with unilateral, publicly stated goals and policies, that is legally accountable for its actions. What does that have to do with this topic? Again there is no such laowai organization. The other links didn't work for me. If the question is, is the media (of many and perhaps all lands) often xenophobic? The answer is a yes.
You are caught in a deadlock because you want to be treated fairly, and not seen in a black and white manner, but since that is not forthcoming, you think that embracing the same logic that you object to will somehow get you closer to a practical stance. That is why I am calling you an uncle tom here. How could I call you an uncle tom if I don't think xenophobia is a real and big problem?
I am just totally sick of the "good laowai, bad laowai" dogma that every single xenophobe in china covers themselves with, and it is just as bad when you use it. Check the history of these forums, almost every time a local xenophobe comes on for the purpose of berating foreigners, they always play the same tune of the good laowai compared to the bad laowai, but everyone can still read the venom between the lines.
Every single Chinese born friend I have would never think to connect me to this incident, anymore than I connect them to anti-black marches in Nanjing that happened. They would consider my finger pointing at this Beijing laowai incident to be a cowardly attempt to ingratiate myself to people (xenophobes) who are simply not worth knowing, and who some Chinese people also find frightening.
I know I am not polite, and sorry for that, but I am clearheaded, and I can clarify any aspects of what I have written if asked. If enough others disagree with what I have written, I will reply to them when I get free time, if asked (I doubt anyone cares), and maybe you can read those replies if they interest you.